Mirror said:In order for Mirror to feel "victimized", it should have thoughts of its own.However, Mirror just reflects how you project your own feelings onto things.And when most people respond negatively, it merely asks: why so negative?
Low said:
Maybe if you stopped pretending you were a bloody mirror and instead behaved like you're a human being, you could cut the pseudo-intellectual crap and actually have a real discussion with us.
But no, you'll probably just respond to this with another irritatingly up-your-own-arse post that makes little sense and doesn't even tackle any points that we've raised.
Lisa said:...it is still amusing! Like flies to shit, I say!
Lisa said:Anyway, if you really love me, you have to show it a bit more, it hasn't come across enough.
To piss and to moan, to disect and mock?
I'd rather dance, turn up the music!
People are
quick to draw conclusions, but Mirror never said the band should do a Felt Mountain 2.
God forbid,
that would be ridiculous.
But there
was a concept, an artistic integrity, a musical quality that has long gone.
Felt Mountain still sounds good, but
even Supernature sounds dated…
Also,
however flattering your insinuations, Mirror hasn’t actually commented on the musical quality of
the upcoming album.
Only questioning the band’s ability to come up with music that is, again,
fresh, renewing, exciting and relevant. It seems
like the general consensus on here is that everything the band will do, will be
better than Head First? Yet nobody wonders how they actually managed to release an album like that in
the first place?
Mirror only
wanted to inject a bit of critical thinking into this place: Head First was only mentioned as the
backdrop against which this new album surely is set?
Lots of people have commented that their excitement stems from a hope for a
return to form, which is in itself quite a bizarre motivation.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!