Whickwithy said:
Archway said:
Absolutely, it is so much easier nowadays. I learned the craft on cassettes, and now it is as easy as can be.
Sartori said:covers and insert notes (as I do L.P.'s) and that's the shame with the moving to digital.
Whickwithy said:
Border_Mind said:I think the mp3 format feels soulless
??!?!?!Border_Mind said:if all an artist can offer is individual songs....If I like an artist it usually goes without saying I am going to appreciate more than three songs
You are clearly not as picky as I am. I have only found two artists in sixty years that were consistently worth more than two or three per album.
Border_Mind said:I still maintain MP3's are rather insipid as anything other than a secondary source of music
Speaking of insipid, what the hell, it's music. I am not going to rub myself all over it or anything. I'm just going to play the damn thing. Easier to play = better for listening. Like when I'm walking, I don't want to carry a turntable, cassette or CD player with me. My MP3 player fits on my collar and I have two thousand songs on it (and, yes, that means about 500 artists)! If I'm going to get all hung up on quality of sound (which I guarantee you I won't - ever. Quality of music is over the top, quality of sound is bullshit), I can outdo any other media with digital.
ping said:the best thing about cassettes was the ability to do mix-tapes and get loads of music cheaply or freely off your mates. thats also what i like about digital music. i still really like to have a physical thing in my hand like vinyl/CD/tape which i miss with mp3's, what happens to your itunes when you die?
i knew a woman in leeds when i was teenager and she worked for a music fanzine and used to send me loads of mix tapes with random obscure stuff. they were some of the best tapes i ever had.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!